tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5654649659503386270.post6588387488016855510..comments2023-11-17T08:28:34.015+00:00Comments on The m-factor: A weird new type of chartWilhelmhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08120996976638555064noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5654649659503386270.post-26919718777858422212009-11-30T09:03:30.322+00:002009-11-30T09:03:30.322+00:00Yup. With the range of possible answers, the resol...Yup. With the range of possible answers, the resolution of the survey got squashed right out of the gateWilhelmhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08120996976638555064noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5654649659503386270.post-1438921042692400952009-11-30T08:50:15.988+00:002009-11-30T08:50:15.988+00:00Both approaches result in a wall of text associate...<i>Both approaches result in a wall of text associated with each image, although the first case was more brutal.</i><br /><br />Yes. That's why I was thinking about the design of the sruvey. A lot of these questions could have been rephrases to a simple "from a scale of 1 to 5..." or something like that, and thus make the result easier to explore and the chart cleaner. As it is now, I can't think of a way of presenting this without a lot of text. And second best option is to use design to separate the questions from the alternatives, in my opinion.Andershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07766751546432262892noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5654649659503386270.post-8369704632278919052009-11-28T14:02:37.391+00:002009-11-28T14:02:37.391+00:00Both approaches result in a wall of text associate...Both approaches result in a wall of text associated with each image, although the first case was more brutal.<br /><br />Agree on the lack of logic behind a 1-100 scale. Increase of the variable space without quantifiable outcomes amplifies the noise to no end.Wilhelmhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08120996976638555064noreply@blogger.com